smoking ban and you
« previous entry | next entry »
Nov. 9th, 2005 | 07:59 pm
mood:
annoyed
Ok folks, let me just make a point:
The day after the election is not the time to complain about something which you could have fought before the election. I didn't see any of you out pamphletting about the smoking ban. I didn't hear of any "No on 901" rallies. I think it's a stupid law, for several reasons, but it does not affect me in the same way it does many of you. You can complain after the fact, but that does not change that you did nothing before the election to create a persuasive argument for anyone to vote no on this. 80% of people in Washington do not smoke tobacco, and so you 20% who do, quite frankly, make participating in certain adult social events difficult for the rest of us, and so people voted in their own self interest. Deal with it. Your rights are not being taken away, as you are certainly welcome to smoke wherever no one is forced to breathe it, and everyone else's rights are enhanced.
It's done, and you did nothing to make it not happen. Either join with the guys who are going to sue (and they will!), or suck it up and quit your disgusting habit, and please stop the self-righteous posturing.
The day after the election is not the time to complain about something which you could have fought before the election. I didn't see any of you out pamphletting about the smoking ban. I didn't hear of any "No on 901" rallies. I think it's a stupid law, for several reasons, but it does not affect me in the same way it does many of you. You can complain after the fact, but that does not change that you did nothing before the election to create a persuasive argument for anyone to vote no on this. 80% of people in Washington do not smoke tobacco, and so you 20% who do, quite frankly, make participating in certain adult social events difficult for the rest of us, and so people voted in their own self interest. Deal with it. Your rights are not being taken away, as you are certainly welcome to smoke wherever no one is forced to breathe it, and everyone else's rights are enhanced.
It's done, and you did nothing to make it not happen. Either join with the guys who are going to sue (and they will!), or suck it up and quit your disgusting habit, and please stop the self-righteous posturing.
...
from:
junya
date: Nov. 9th, 2005 06:07 pm (UTC)
Link
would it have really mattered if anyone who was against it did? it's not like this passed by like, 1% of the vote or anything. plus, once again, anyone that did complain was/would be dismissed because they smoked for the most part.
plus, okay... lawsuit, that really worked out well for new york and california didn't it?
Reply | Thread
...
from:
brothersterno
date: Nov. 9th, 2005 06:11 pm (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
...
from:
junya
date: Nov. 9th, 2005 06:12 pm (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
...
from:
brothersterno
date: Nov. 9th, 2005 11:09 pm (UTC)
Link
I agree that this initiative is totally over the line as far as the restrictions on what individuals can do in public space. just like a ban on naked people, drug use, and where you can drive.
Reply | Parent | Thread
oh puhlease
from:
mercuryslavejq
date: Nov. 9th, 2005 06:18 pm (UTC)
Link
Reply | Thread
hyperbole for the purpose of illustration!
from:
brothersterno
date: Nov. 9th, 2005 06:25 pm (UTC)
Link
THBBBPPPPTHHTHTHT!!! :P
Reply | Parent | Thread
Re: hyperbole for the purpose of illustration!
from:
mercuryslavejq
date: Nov. 9th, 2005 06:30 pm (UTC)
Link
ANyhee... all good points- but you're still a hippy.
Reply | Parent | Thread
Hippie? Hipster? Goth?
from:
brothersterno
date: Nov. 9th, 2005 06:49 pm (UTC)
Link
You're the one who likes to go kayaking :-D
Reply | Parent | Thread
Re: Hippie? Hipster? Goth?
from:
ocean
date: Nov. 9th, 2005 07:21 pm (UTC)
Link
Unless you are in the military, then it becomes the source of everyone's amusement.
*hide the vegetarian snack food, the hiking boots, and all organic products*
Sooo hmm. Would Q be a Hippagoth? Or a gothppie?
Reply | Parent | Thread
Re: Hippie? Hipster? Goth?
from:
brothersterno
date: Nov. 9th, 2005 07:32 pm (UTC)
Link
Hippie tendencies are one thing, patchouli and hiking boots all the time? totally different!
Reply | Parent | Thread
Re: Hippie? Hipster? Goth?
from:
ocean
date: Nov. 9th, 2005 07:38 pm (UTC)
Link
No no, Q is not a hippogoth. Gothippi. I like the ring on that. :P Though it might be fun to see Q beat someone up.
Reply | Parent | Thread
Re: Hippie? Hipster? Goth?
from:
mercuryslavejq
date: Nov. 9th, 2005 09:00 pm (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
Re: Hippie? Hipster? Goth?
from:
brothersterno
date: Nov. 9th, 2005 09:49 pm (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
Re: Hippie? Hipster? Goth?
from:
batboymaxx
date: Nov. 9th, 2005 11:25 pm (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
Re: Hippie? Hipster? Goth?
from:
brothersterno
date: Nov. 9th, 2005 11:37 pm (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
Re: Hippie? Hipster? Goth?
from:
mikelmotorcycle
date: Nov. 11th, 2005 10:26 pm (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
...
from:
luxxdesade
date: Nov. 9th, 2005 06:38 pm (UTC)
Link
The issue I've heard, is there aren't the same loopholes that the Cali law has. Its no smoking within 50 ft of a public building or shop, unless a specific smoking area has been set up (which helped out clubs, restaurants, etc.) ALSO bars here that are family owned/runned don't have to follow the law, but it has to be FAMILY only on staff. Granted you also don't have to serve food here to serve drinks.
Reply | Thread
...
from:
g33kduck
date: Nov. 9th, 2005 11:27 pm (UTC)
Link
And to set everyone back on the right track, hes a red neck, not a hippy. :P
Reply | Thread
...
from:
chris
date: Nov. 10th, 2005 12:05 am (UTC)
Link
Reply | Thread
...
from:
brothersterno
date: Nov. 10th, 2005 12:41 am (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
...
from:
gingerroo
date: Nov. 10th, 2005 11:44 am (UTC)
Link
I personally think if it's about anyone it's about a business owners right to allow a legal act in their business. Other then that - and more importantly - I think it's about everyone and what sort of control they want to give their government over a very diverse society and the choices an individual is allowed to make. Understanding that it was already very regulated. So I guess I'll keep bitching, crying and whining about it as long as I feel like it.
Yay! That'll be fun!
Well at least you won't have to hear it cause we'll all be outside complaining!
Reply | Thread
...
from:
brothersterno
date: Nov. 10th, 2005 05:22 pm (UTC)
Link
nobody is forcing you to smoke, it's not a state of being human, like the desire not to be oppressed and the desire to have free thought. Smoking is something which has undergone a drastic cultural shift in its acceptability, and at this point it's possible for a citizens initiative to get onto the ballot and to be voted into law stating that people who are making the choice to smoke should do it where they dont' affect other people.
This is the tyrrany of the majority, and it's not right, per se, but it's how it works. You have a right to smoke wherever you want, as long as it does not hurt everyone else's right not to breathe it.
Next year, I'm going to see if I can get the american lung association to sponsor an initiative to band car exhaust where people can breathe it. I suspect that, if worded correctly (and using the same logic as this initiative), I can at least get some signatures, and possibly get it onto the ballot.
Reply | Parent | Thread
...
from:
gingerroo
date: Nov. 10th, 2005 09:55 pm (UTC)
Link
Yummy cheese.
I think your car exhaust idea is suburb, especially if backed by all the wonderful stats I'm sure there are about the nastiness of that. In reality I see cars (and their pollution) as an often nessecery evil, however these behemoths cruising the roads every day carrying nothing but a single pwned consumer make me want to start breaking shi- uh -make me want to change the law!
Reply | Parent | Thread
...
from:
brothersterno
date: Nov. 10th, 2005 09:58 pm (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
...
from:
gingerroo
date: Nov. 10th, 2005 10:29 pm (UTC)
Link
Oh jesus.
Irony is one of the best things ever.
Reply | Parent | Thread
...
from:
kamala
date: Nov. 13th, 2005 09:30 am (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread